THE CENSUS RECORDS ABOUT PRIESTS AND CLERGYMEN, THEIR FAMILIES IN THE TOBOLSK DIOCESE
IN XVIII – EARLY XX CENTURIES: EVOLUTION OF THE FORM

Spichak Aleksandra Vladimirovna, Candidate of historical sciences, senior lecturer, sub-department of document science and general history, Nizhnevartovsk State University (56 Lenina street, Nizhnevartovsk, Tyumen region, Russia), spichak-89@mail.ru

930.253

DOI

10.21685/2072-3024-2018-1-3

Background. Relevance of work is caused by that research of development of forms the census records about sacred and clergymen, their families in the Tobolsk diocese of XVIII – the early of the XX centuries, identification and the analysis of
the factors which defined changes in the contents and registration of these documents promotes understanding of tendencies of development of church clerical work. Novelty of work consists that questions of evolution of registration the census
records in the Tobolsk diocese of that time still remain not studied. Article purpose – research of changes in registration the census records in the Tobolsk diocese in XVIII – early XX centuries.
Materials and methods. Realization of research tasks is reached on the basis of the documents taken from funds of the State archives of the Tyumen and Kurgan areas. A methodological basis of research are general scientific (the functional and
structurally functional analysis, the theoretical analysis and synthesis, a structural and typological method), historical (the retrospective and comparative-historical analysis) and special methods of document science (methods of unification and
standardization of documents).
Results. The author presented results of the comparative analysis of development of forms the census records of the Tobolsk diocese of XVIII – early XX centuries according to requirements of the legislation that allowed to judge evolution of the
form of the considered sources. The special attention is paid to extent of realization of the legislative norms regulating rules of registration parish the census records in the Tobolsk diocese throughout XVIII – early XX centuries. It is found out that
practice of clerical work in parish churches, being exposed to the regulating influence, it was constantly improved, supplemented with new elements.
Conclusions. The article concludes that the considered documents of audit in different churches practically don’t differ from the audit in registration. Thus, the evolution of these documents was happening gradually and evenly in all territories of Tobolsk diocese.

Key words

census records of priests and clergymen and their families, Tobolsk diocese, parish churches, synodal period, document form, church office work

 Download PDF

1. Ditrikh I. I. Ispovednye rospisi i metricheskie knigi kak istochniki po istoricheskoy demografii g. Pskova [Confessional signatures and metric books as sources of historical demography in Pskov]. Available at: e-lib.gasu.ru/konf/mak/arhiv/2004-2/37.rtf (accessed
February 08, 2016).
2. Mironov B. N. Vspomogatel'nye istoricheskie distsipliny: v 33 t. [Auxiliary historical subjects: in 33 volumes]. Leningrad, 1989, vol. 20, pp. 102–117.
3. Sukhina E. N. Dokumenty Chelyabinskogo dukhovnogo pravleniya vtoroy poloviny XVIII veka v istoriko-lingvisticheskom aspekte: po arkhivnym materialam: avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Documents of Chelyabinsk religious administration of the second hald
of XVIII century in terms of history and linguistics: archival materials: author’s abstract of dissertation to apply for the degree of the candidate of philological sciences]. Chelyabinsk, 2006, 26 p.
4. Lebedev V. B. Pskovskoe dukhovenstvo vo vtoroy polovine XVIII v.: dis. kand. ist. nauk [Pskov clergy in the second half of XVIII century: dissertation to apply for the degree of the candidate of historical sciences]. Pskov, 2003, p. 34.
5. Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiyskoy Imperii (dalee – PSZRI). Sobr. 1 [Ultimate collection of laws of the Russian Empire (hereinafter – PSZRI). Collection 1]. T. V. № 3287. S. 618, 619.
6. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. V. № 3355. S. 693, 694.
7. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. V. № 3460. S. 757–759.
8. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. VI. № 3481. S. 1.
9. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. VI. № 3932. S. 524.
10. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. VI. № 4035. S. 720.
11. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. XII. № 8914. S. 75.
12. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. VI. № 3492. S. 119, 120.
13. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. VI. № 3787. S. 391–394.
14. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. XII. № 8884. S. 31, 32.
15. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. XXXI. № 24 635. S. 651–653.
16. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. XXXIII. № 25 882. S. 207–213.
17. PSZRI. Sobr. 1. T. XXXIII. № 25 924. S. 264–266.
18. PSZRI. Sobr. 2. T. VIII. Otd. 1. № 6265. S. 344.
19. PSZRI. Sobr. 2. T. IX. Otd. 2. № 6500 a. S. 34–37.
20. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv v g. Tobol'ske (dalee – GAT) [The State Archive of Tobolsk (hereinafter – GAT)]. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 26. L. 1.
21. GAT. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 1–3 ob.
22. GAT. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 4, 5.
23. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Kurganskoy oblasti (dalee – GAKO) [The State Archive of Kurgan region (hereinafter – GAKO)]. F. 207. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 1–4 ob.
24. GAKO. F. 207. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 5, 6 ob.
25. GAKO. F. 109. Op. 1. D. 2. L. 92–92 ob.
26. GAKO. F. 109. Op. 1. D. 2. L. 89–89 ob.
27. GAKO. F. 109. Op. 1. D. 2. L. 90, 91 ob.
28. GAKO. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 7–11.
29. GAKO. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 12–17.
30. GAKO. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 18–21 ob.
31. GAKO. F. 86. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 22–27.
32. GAKO. F. 207. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 7–12.
33. GAKO. F. 207. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 13 ob.–16.
34. GAKO. F. 207. Op. 1. D. 1. L. 17 ob.–20.
35. GAT. F. 92. Op. 1. D. 4. L. 1–17.
36. GAT. F. 653. Op. 1. D. 3. L. 1–10.